Artificial intelligence models are becoming increasingly capable, but they still need structured and secure ways to interact with real-time data. From data scraping to database access and automation, connecting large language models (LLMs) to the right data sources is today’s most efficient way to level up any AI-powered pipeline.
That’s where Model Context Protocol (MCP) becomes an irreplaceable cog in modern AI – a new standard that’s transforming how AI applications connect with tools and data.
In this article, we’ll explain what MCP is, how it works, and review the 10 best MCP servers used today to improve AI workflows, coding assistants, and modern research automation.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a framework that allows AI models to securely connect to external tools, APIs, and data sources. It was introduced to make structured data access easier for AI systems, where a model can fetch information dynamically instead of relying on static training data.
In simple terms, think of MCP as an API built specifically for AI. Instead of traditional request/response patterns, MCP enables AI models to understand context, maintain session state, and trigger actions more efficiently in AI .
This architecture allows developers to:
Safely extend an LLM’s capabilities
Add contextual memory and fresh data flow
Integrate existing systems with little to no additional expenses
With a growing number of MCP options available, choosing the right one depends on your technical needs and workflow. To narrow down the top options, we evaluated each server based on:
Ease of setup and integration – How quickly can developers get it running?
Official vs. community support – Is it maintained by a trusted vendor or an active open-source community?
Feature depth & extensibility – Does it offer plugins, APIs, or workflows that go beyond basic data access?
Ease of setup & integration — Measured on a 1–10 scale.
Pricing & licensing transparency – Open-source, commercial, or hybrid models?
Real-world use cases – Coding, research, DevOps, automation, or custom AI pipelines?
We also analyzed sources like MCP Market, PulseMCP, Portkey.ai, and community GitHub repositories to find the most active and well-maintained MCP servers available today.
| Category | Best for | Official / community | Setup difficulty (1-10) | Free version | Starting price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Oxylabs | Real-time data access & web scraping | AI agents, RAG pipelines | Official | 4/10 | Yes, free trial | From $49/mo |
| 2.GitHub MCP | Coding & DevOps | Code assistants, repos | Official | 3/10 | Yes | Free |
| 3.Postman MCP | APIs & automation | API discovery, testing | Official | 3/10 | Yes | From $19/mo |
| 4.Memory Bank / Context Portal | Memory & RAG | Persistent context & storage | Community | 5/10 | Yes | Free |
| 5.Rube (Composio) | Connectors & SaaS | Multi-app automation | Community | 5/10 | Yes | From $29/mo |
| 6.Playwright MCP | Browser automation | Web interaction, scraping | Community | 6/10 | Yes | Free |
| 7.Notion MCP | Knowledge management | Research, productivity | Official | 5/10 | Yes | From $8/mo |
| 8.Sequential Thinking MCP | AI planning | Task sequencing, reasoning | Community | 4/10 | Yes | Free |
| 9.n8n MCP | Workflow automation | No-code integrations | Community | 4/10 | Yes | From $20/mo (cloud) |
| 10.DB & Semantic Memory MCP | Data & knowledge storage | RAG systems | Community | 5/10 | Yes | Depends on DB host |
Before going into more detail, it’s worth defining and clearing up the types of MCP servers out there. You should get familiar with these categories as it will help you narrow down the right fit for your workflow:
Official Servers: Maintained by companies or organizations, like Oxylabs, Github, or Postman. These offer high reliability, robust documentation, and stable updates.
Community Servers: Open-source and flexible, like Playwright, Memory Bank, or Sequential Thinking MCP. These ones are ideal for experimentation and customizable implementations, but often require more technical setup and community support.
Specialized Servers: Purpose-built for specific workflows, such as Claude Code, Cursor IDE, or enhanced search capabilities.
Category: Web scraping & public data access
Best For: AI agents, RAG pipelines, and enterprise data workflows
Official/Community: Official
Price: From $49/month
Setup Difficulty: 4/10
Key Features:
Powerful data collection infrastructure with proxy rotation
Structured data retrieval
Seamless integration with MCP Web Scraper
Use Cases:
Real-time data collection for LLMs
Market research and competitor analysis
Automating RAG pipelines
Pros: Reliable access to any public web data, well-documented, highly scalable
Cons: Paid tiers required for advanced use
Category: Coding & DevOps
Best For: Coding assistants and repository insights
Official/Community: Official
Price: Free
Setup Difficulty: 3/10
Key Features:
Interact with repositories, branches, and pull requests
Access code snippets and metadata directly via MCP
Secure authentication via GitHub OAuth
Use Cases:
Code analysis and summaries
Automated issue ranking and reviews
Pros: Reliable, developer-friendly, officially maintained
Cons: Limited beyond GitHub-specific workflows
Category: API integration
Best For: Developers and API testing automation
Official/Community: Official
Price: Free + paid plans from $19month
Setup Difficulty: 3/10
Key Features:
API collection management through MCP endpoints
Multi-environment support for dev and staging
Agent-level API orchestration
Use Cases:
Automating API tests and calls
Building AI agents that connect multiple services
Pros: Mature platform, strong developer ecosystem
Cons: Requires a Postman account and setup
Category: Memory & RAG
Best For: Long-term context storage
Official/Community: Community
Price: Free
Setup Difficulty: 5/10
Key Features:
Embedding and vector memory storage
Constant context retrieval across sessions
Semantic search and caching
Use Cases:
AI chatbots with long-term memory
Knowledge-based AI agents
Pros: Critical for RAG workflows, open-source
Cons: Requires manual setup and database setup
Category: Connectors & SaaS (Software as a Service)
Best For: Automating multi-app workflows
Official/Community: Community
Price: Free + paid plans from $29/month
Setup Difficulty: 5/10
Key Features:
500+ ready-to-use SaaS connectors
Secure credential management
Modular workflow creation environment
Use Cases:
Customer relationship management (CRM) automation
Report generation
Data syncing
Pros: Wide integration range for different purposes
Cons: Harder setup for enterprise-level use
Category: Browser automation
Best For: UI testing and web data extraction
Official/Community: Community (Microsoft-supported project)
Price: Free
Setup Difficulty: 6/10
Key Features:
Headless browser automation
Screenshot and DOM parsing
Cross-browser support (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
Use Cases:
Web testing automation
Scraping dynamic JavaScript-heavy sites
Pros: Excellent control, highly flexible
Cons: Higher setup complexity
Category: Knowledge base management
Best For: Integrating LLMs with Notion data
Official/Community: Official
Price: Free + paid plans from $8/month
Setup Difficulty: 5/10
Key Features:
Access to Notion databases and pages
Real-time data queries
API-based system for data retrieval
Use Cases:
AI knowledge assistants
Research and content planning
Pros: User-friendly, integrated Notion API
Cons: Limited to only Notion environments
Category: AI planning
Best For: Reasoning and task planning
Official/Community: Community
Price: Free
Setup Difficulty: 4/10
Key Features:
Chain-of-thought planning for AI agents
Multi-step decision logic
Use Cases:
Building reasoning pipelines
Task management for AI workflows
Pros: Quality reasoning for AI agents
Cons: Requires a lot of fine-tuning for complex tasks
Category: Workflow automation
Best For: No-code or low-code integrations
Official/Community: Community
Price: Free + paid plans from $20/month (cloud)
Setup Difficulty: 4/10
Key Features:
Visual builder for automation
Prebuilt integrations and triggers
MCP support for AI extensions
Use Cases:
Automating AI pipelines
Connecting LLMs to APIs or CRMs
Pros: Easy to use, powerful no-code solution
Cons: Requires cloud or self-hosting setup
Category: Data & knowledge storage
Best For: RAG systems and context retrieval
Official/Community: Community
Price: Free (Depends on DB host, e.g. Pinecone free tier)
Setup Difficulty: 5/10
Key Features:
PostgreSQL-based or vector databases
Continuous context for AI agents
Use Cases:
RAG pipelines
Knowledge management for enterprise AI
Pros: Highly beneficial for memory-rich AI apps
Cons: Database configuration required
One single tool cannot be a silver bullet for all cases, and MCP servers are no exception. Here we’ll give top recommendations for specific use cases.

Claude Code is a highly popular environment for MCP servers to extend its coding capabilities. The right choice of servers here can help streamline repository access, file management, and web data retrieval, which can be covered by:
Anthropic Code MCP
Filesystem MCP Server
Oxylabs MCP
Anthropic’s own Code MCP is used for smooth communication with Claude’s coding sandbox, while Filesystem MCP enables easy file-level access for reading, writing, and navigation. Oxylabs MCP is a very beneficial addition to an external data layer, allowing Claude Code to fetch real-time structured data and integrate it directly into the coding process.
Cursor users usually rely on MCP to provide live code execution, repository insights, and automation within the editor. Some of the highly recommended options are:
Run Python MCP Server
GitHub MCP
Rube (Composio)
Run Python MCP is often used for safer inline code execution, which helps validate and test code on the fly. GitHub MCP is hands-down the best option for full integration with repositories (issues, commits, pull requests) without leaving Cursor. Finally, Rube, with its multi-service connectivity, is a nice addition for Cursor users to link external APIs and services to automate repetitive development tasks, which are quite common in professional environments.
Beyond Claude and Cursor, several other AI-assisted IDEs and coding agents can also benefit from MCP servers that improve context, automation, and data flow, such as:
Playwright MCP
Puppeteer MCP Server
Google Drive MCP Server
These servers extend coding tools with automation and data management capabilities. Playwright and Puppeteer MCPs handle browser interactions and web navigation, ideal for testing or retrieving data from web apps. Meanwhile, Google Drive MCP supports document and file versioning for collaborative development projects.
For developers using custom AI environments, self-hosted setups, or LLM customization frameworks, general-purpose MCP servers usually provide that additional flexibility to build advanced automations. Our best pick are:
Oxylabs MCP
PulseMCP
LocalDocs MCP
Oxylabs MCP is best used for unlocking real-time data access and scraping capabilities for integrating live data flows into codebases. PulseMCP acts as a lightweight orchestration layer that connects multiple MCPs for large-scale workflows, while LocalDocs MCP is a very highly regarded tool that helps developers manage private documentation.
MCP servers represent a significant shift in how AI interacts with the real-time world. Traditional APIs or SDKs only act as single communication lines, but MCP standardizes and scales this process for modern AI agents. Using MCP servers can bring loads of benefits, including:
Speed: AI models access data through efficient pipelines for improved responsiveness.
Accuracy: Access to real-time data gives more accurate responses.
Context: Preserve context between sessions.
Automation: Reduced manual configuration by abstracting complex toolchains.
Scalability: Easily connect multiple agents and systems with minimal setup.
Developer can build an AI agent that scrapes structured web data, queries SQL databases, and summarizes it into actionable insights – all through interconnected MCP endpoints. For example, connecting an OpenAI agent to the Oxylabs Web Scraper API through an MCP server allows it to gather live market data or monitor product listings automatically.
That said, MCP is not the only protocol used in advanced AI workflows. Agent2Agent (A2A) is a popular protocol still used in various pipelines, so you can compare A2A vs MCP and see which framework fits your AI application and the whole project.
MCP servers are rapidly becoming the foundation of intelligent and context-aware AI applications. Whether you’re running a coding assistant, automating business tasks, or building RAG pipelines, choosing the right MCP server can noticeably improve speed, accuracy, and scalability of your project.
To level up your AI workflows, start with a reliable, production-grade option like Oxylabs MCP, then expand your setup with community servers like Memory Bank, Playwright, or Rube and build highly scalable AI pipelines easier than ever before.
The best MCP server depends on your specific use case and setup. Oxylabs MCP is ideal for data access and scraping, while GitHub or Run Python MCP servers work better for coding and automation. Evaluate each MCP based on your workflow, support, and scalability needs.
MCP servers connect AI models with real-time data, APIs, and tools. They give large language models additional ways to interact with live environments instead of relying only on static training data. This makes AI workflows faster, more accurate, and more adaptable.
There are hundreds of official and community-built MCP servers available. You can find them in public directories like MCP Market, PulseMCP, and Portkey.ai, or browse GitHub repositories for various open-source implementations.
You can use MCP servers in AI coding assistants, DevOps automation, enterprise bots, and data analysis tools. They’re widely integrated into platforms like Claude Code, Cursor, and custom LLM agents to improve performance and necessary context handling.
An API connects to one service, while an MCP server manages many through a shared standard. It acts like a common interface that lets AI agents discover and use multiple APIs, databases, or databases seamlessly within a single workflow.
Most official MCP servers use authentication, encryption, and access control to ensure user and LLM safety. Open-source versions can be equally secure if configured properly and deployed in a controlled environment. Be sure to always follow known best practices for data privacy.
About the author

Dovydas Vėsa
Technical Content Researcher
Dovydas Vėsa is a Technical Content Researcher at Oxylabs. He creates in-depth technical content and tutorials for web scraping and data collection solutions, drawing from a background in journalism, cybersecurity, and a lifelong passion for tech, gaming, and all kinds of creative projects.
All information on Oxylabs Blog is provided on an "as is" basis and for informational purposes only. We make no representation and disclaim all liability with respect to your use of any information contained on Oxylabs Blog or any third-party websites that may be linked therein. Before engaging in scraping activities of any kind you should consult your legal advisors and carefully read the particular website's terms of service or receive a scraping license.



Vytenis Kaubrė
2025-10-07


Yelyzaveta Hayrapetyan
2025-09-11
Try out Oxylabs MCP for free
Unlock real-time data access to your AI applications. Choose Oxylabs' advanced web intelligence solutions.
Get the latest news from data gathering world
Scale up your business with Oxylabs®
Proxies
Advanced proxy solutions
Data Collection
Datasets
Resources
Innovation hub
Try out Oxylabs MCP for free
Unlock real-time data access to your AI applications. Choose Oxylabs' advanced web intelligence solutions.