Back to blog

GeeLark vs. MoreLogin: Comparison

Agne Matuseviciute avatar

Agnė Matusevičiūtė

Last updated on

2025-09-24

5 min read

Disclaimer: The analysis presented in this article relies on information current as of 2025/09/24. Before depending on any comparative data, all users are advised to confirm the most recent status of products and services.

In the world of multi-account management, the line between success and detection often comes down to the quality of your tools. While many antidetect solutions focus on browser profiles, a new frontier is emerging: mobile device emulation and virtualization. 

GeeLark, a mobile-first platform built around cloud-based Android phones, and MoreLogin, a veteran antidetect browser that has integrated a powerful cloud phone solution, represent two leading approaches from different origins.

This article provides a detailed comparison of GeeLark and MoreLogin, examining everything from pricing and features to their core anti-fingerprinting technologies to help you decide which platform is truly the right fit for your mobile and web-based operations in 2025.

GeeLark vs. MoreLogin: Quick Overview

GeeLark

GeeLark homepage

GeeLark positions itself as a mobile-first antidetect solution. Its core product is the cloud phone – a complete, genuine Android operating system running on real hardware in the cloud. This allows users to operate what are essentially remote smartphones, complete with unique device-level fingerprints (like IMEI and Android ID), access to the Google Play Store, and full control over sensors like GPS and camera. It’s designed for tasks that require the highest level of mobile realism.

MoreLogin

MoreLogin homepage

MoreLogin is a well-established antidetect browser built for managing multiple browser-based accounts. Its primary strength lies in creating distinct browser environments (based on Chrome or Firefox) with deeply customized fingerprints (Canvas, WebGL, fonts). While its foundation is in web browsers, MoreLogin has expanded to include a "cloud phone" feature, designed to bring mobile capabilities to its user base, primarily for mobile web browsing and app access within its ecosystem.

Pricing Comparison

GeeLark subscription fees

GeeLark uses a hybrid model. You pay a monthly subscription for a set number of profiles and team seats, which also includes a monthly allowance of free cloud phone minutes. It offers the following pricing plans:

  • Free: 2 profiles (includes 30 minutes of cloud phone time).

  • Base: Starts at $5/month for 5 profiles (includes 60 minutes/month).

  • Pro: Starts at $19/month for 20 profiles (includes 60 minutes/month).

  • Cloud phone usage: After the free minutes are used, billing is $0.007 per minute. A key benefit is the daily cost cap of $1.00 per device, which prevents runaway costs.

MoreLogin subscription fees

MoreLogin uses a more traditional SaaS subscription model, where the price is primarily determined by the number of profiles and users. It offers the following pricing plans:

  • Free: 2 profiles and 2 users.

  • Pro: Starts at $9/month for 10 profiles and 2 users. Plans scale up to 1000+ profiles.

  • Custom: Enterprise-level plans with custom features and support.

  • Cloud phone usage: The cloud phone feature is typically treated as an add-on, and its cost is separate from the main subscription for browser profiles.

Operating System Compatibility

GeeLark supports Windows (10 version or above), macOS (10.15 or above), and Linux (Ubuntu desktop 22.04.5 or higher). GeeLark's inclusion of Linux support gives it a slight edge in platform diversity.

MoreLogin supports Windows (10, 64-bit and above) and MacOS (12.6.1 and above).

Resource consumption & performance

GeeLark

Since the Android device runs in the cloud, GeeLark is surprisingly light on local CPU and RAM. The primary local resource it consumes is network bandwidth, as it streams the device's screen to your computer. A stable internet connection is crucial for a smooth experience.

MoreLogin

MoreLogin runs browser profiles locally on your machine. Its resource consumption is tied to your local CPU and RAM. Running many browser profiles simultaneously can be memory-intensive, requiring a machine with at least 8GB-16GB of RAM for heavy use.

Unique features

While both Geelark and MoreLogin offer core functionalities for managing multiple accounts, each platform stands out with unique features designed to meet different user needs.

GeeLark’s entire platform is architected around providing a real, virtualized smartphone experience. It offers the following features:

  • Real OS & hardware: Each cloud phone runs a full version of Android on genuine hardware, not an emulator. This means it has a legitimate bootloader, kernel, and hardware identifiers.

  • Full device fingerprint: It provides a complete device identity, including IMEI, MAC address, Android ID, and sensor data (gyroscope, accelerometer). This is extremely difficult for platforms to flag as a non-genuine device.

  • Google Play Store access: You can install any application directly from the official Google Play Store, ensuring app integrity and compatibility.

  • Hardware features: Higher-tier cloud phones offer features like a virtual camera and microphone, essential for verification processes or specific app functions.

MoreLogin’s mobile offering is an extension of its browser-based system. It offers the following features:

  • Real ARM-based hardware emulation: MoreLogin's cloud phones run on actual ARM processors in cloud servers, providing authentic Android environments rather than software emulation.

  • Device fingerprint: The platform provides comprehensive device identifiers, including IMEI, MAC & Bluetooth addresses, hardware IDs.

  • App access: MoreLogin supports direct app installation through their built-in app center and allows APK uploads. The platform includes ROOT functionality support and can run native Android applications, not just mobile web browsers.

  • Integration: MoreLogin's strength lies in seamlessly integrating cloud phone functionality with their established antidetect browser ecosystem, offering unified proxy management and team collaboration tools.

Anti-fingerprinting technology

GeeLark focuses on device-level fingerprinting. By providing a real hardware and OS environment, it bypasses the need to "spoof" many parameters because they are genuinely unique to the cloud device instance. Its realism is its greatest strength.

MoreLogin excels at browser-level fingerprinting. It uses a vast database of real-user data to intelligently mask and replace dozens of parameters, including Canvas fingerprints, WebGL, fonts, audio contexts, and browser versions.

Usability & User Interface (UI)

GeeLark’s UI feels like a remote desktop client (like VNC or TeamViewer) for a smartphone. You are presented with a window showing the live Android screen, which you interact with using your mouse and keyboard. It's intuitive for anyone who has used a smartphone.

MoreLogin’s UI is a clean, professional dashboard for creating, organizing, and launching browser profiles. It's built for efficiency, with features for batch creation, proxy assignment, and team collaboration clearly laid out.

Use cases

Geelark and MoreLogin cater to different audiences, and understanding their key use cases helps clarify which tool is the better fit for specific workflows.

Choose GeeLark if your work involves:

  • Native mobile app management (e.g., TikTok, Instagram, banking apps).

  • Platforms with strict device checks that look for IMEI or sensor data.

  • Building long-term account trust where consistent device identity is key.

  • Tasks requiring the Google Play Store or official app installations.

Choose MoreLogin if your work involves:

  • Browser-based tasks (e.g., e-commerce, ad management, affiliate marketing).

  • Web scraping and automation using Selenium or Puppeteer.

  • Managing hundreds of web profiles in a cost-effective way.

  • Quick, lightweight tasks that don't need a full mobile OS.

GeeLark vs. MoreLogin compared

To make the differences clearer, you'll find a side-by-side comparison of Geelark and MoreLogin across their key features below.

Feature GeeLark MoreLogin
Core product True cloud-based Android phones Antidetect browser
Cloud phone realism High (real OS, hardware IDs, sensors) High (ARM-based hardware with complete device fingerprints)
Best for Native mobile apps Unified mobile/desktop workflow management
Pricing Base plan starts at $5/month
Pro plan starts at $9/month
Subscription + pay-per-minute usage
Subscription per profile count
Local resources Network-intensive CPU & RAM-intensive
Fingerprinting focus Device-level Browser-level
Platform support Windows, macOS, Linux Windows, macOS

Final thoughts

Choosing between GeeLark and MoreLogin is not about picking a "better" tool, but the right tool for your specific job.

GeeLark is an incredible choice for mobile-native operations. If your workflow depends on interacting with real mobile apps, requires a persistent and authentic device identity, and needs to pass advanced security checks, GeeLark's true cloud Android environment is the superior choice. It offers a level of realism that browser-based solutions cannot match.

MoreLogin stands out as a powerful, integrated ecosystem for users who manage operations across both web browsers and mobile apps. It combines its browser fingerprinting with a full-featured cloud phone solution, allowing you to manage all your assets in one place. Its mobile capabilities are a core part of its platform, offering a level of realism that directly competes with dedicated mobile solutions.

Ultimately, analyze your primary workflow. If you prefer a dedicated, mobile-centric specialist, GeeLark is an excellent choice. If you need a versatile, all-in-one platform to manage both browser and native app operations, go with MoreLogin. And lastly, if you want to dive deeper into this topic, check our article on best antidetect browsers of 2025.

About the author

Agne Matuseviciute avatar

Agnė Matusevičiūtė

Technical Copywriter

With a background in philology and pedagogy, Agnė focuses on making complicated tech simple.

All information on Oxylabs Blog is provided on an "as is" basis and for informational purposes only. We make no representation and disclaim all liability with respect to your use of any information contained on Oxylabs Blog or any third-party websites that may be linked therein. Before engaging in scraping activities of any kind you should consult your legal advisors and carefully read the particular website's terms of service or receive a scraping license.

Forget about complex web scraping processes

Choose Oxylabs' advanced web intelligence collection solutions to gather real-time public data hassle-free.

Related articles

Best Antidetect Browsers of 2025
The Best Antidetect Browsers of 2025
roberta avatar

Roberta Aukstikalnyte

2025-07-01

incogniton vs multilogin
Incogniton vs. Multilogin 2025: Antidetect Browsers Comparison
Maryia Stsiopkina avatar

Maryia Stsiopkina

2025-01-02

GoLogin vs. Multilogin
GoLogin vs. Multilogin 2025: Anti-detect Browsers Comparison
vytenis kaubre avatar

Vytenis Kaubrė

2025-01-02

Get the latest news from data gathering world

Forget about complex web scraping processes

Choose Oxylabs' advanced web intelligence collection solutions to gather real-time public data hassle-free.